After resisting pressure, the social network has finally followed Twitter and Google – but that doesn’t mean the move will make a difference, writes James Moore
At a time when there are real concerns about the way Facebook has been used to influence elections, and with a US presidential poll looming, Mark Zuckerberg’s blasé response to the spread of toxic misinformation via his platform has attracted a torrent of criticism, and justifiably so.
Twitter has banned political ads and flagged tweets from President Trump as “potentially misleading”. Google has imposed restrictions to prevent “micro-targeting” of voters based on their political affiliation, and tightened its policy on “demonstrably false” claims.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.